Brief:
Practically, it is not the 1982-citizenship laws that stripped off citizenship but the authority who are intentionally reluctant to access the Rohingya's historical existence and ancestral evidence that prove primary evidence earlier than prior to 1824 and also not allowing to recourse the citizenship under new citizenship act. The fact is that after British occupation of Arakan in1824, the repatriated Rohingya war victims of 1784 and 1794 Burman king invasion of Arkan, were miscounted as British era settlers by central rulers.
There are:- { Rakhine/Mag, Bamar, (Religion: Buddhist); Rohingya, Kaman, Rakhine-muslims (Religion: Muslim); Tribal people- Sak, Dinet/Chakma, Chin, Mro/Khami (Religion: Hindhu, Christian, Animist)}, are inhabitants of Arakan. By religion or people, Rakhines are being majority and Rohingyas follow second.
{ “In this newspaper report of July 1961, it was written- "National
Rohingyans living within Mayu district are, nationals of Union of
Myanmar"}
Practically, it is not the 1982-citizenship laws that stripped off citizenship but the authority who are intentionally reluctant to access the Rohingya's historical existence and ancestral evidence that prove primary evidence earlier than prior to 1824 and also not allowing to recourse the citizenship under new citizenship act. The fact is that after British occupation of Arakan in1824, the repatriated Rohingya war victims of 1784 and 1794 Burman king invasion of Arkan, were miscounted as British era settlers by central rulers.
Like in 1978 and 1992, after drove out of Rohingyans and Kamans from their ancestral homelands, the authorities tactically started collection of data and those forcefully repatriated under bilateral agreement were branded as Bengali so it could be accounted by exclusion of Rohingya into national census as a creation official evidence for national population history. Yet many new Burman scholars are relying on such fake resources.
Following intl pressures, the authorities are also forcing the Rohingyas and Kamans to accept unusual identity which is different to usual citizenship card. This unusual card is different colour and has not description of race and religion and considering not a citizen. When the Rohingya in the camp refused to sign the documents, the authority threatened the Rohingya and Kaman victims that no signing would no aid ever made it through the blockades again including aid from foreign organizations. Therefore, the citizenship verification process will not be free and fair unless monitor by international community.
..........................................................There are:- { Rakhine/Mag, Bamar, (Religion: Buddhist); Rohingya, Kaman, Rakhine-muslims (Religion: Muslim); Tribal people- Sak, Dinet/Chakma, Chin, Mro/Khami (Religion: Hindhu, Christian, Animist)}, are inhabitants of Arakan. By religion or people, Rakhines are being majority and Rohingyas follow second.
Estimation to figure out accurate number of the total
Arakan population is difficult because the government's immigration figure
states just around 4 millions in 2009 that always excludes Rohingya population
of both inside and outside. The inclusion of Islam religion in that 4 million
figure is just covered Kaman muslims and Rakhine muslims living in Sittwe,
Rambre, Minbya, Mrauk Oo, Tandwe and Myebon townships.
Latterly, the
various intl reports of estimating around 800,000 Rohingyas is just for
Northern Arakan/Rakhine (NRS) that doesn't count the Rohingyas living in
Southern Arakan of Sittwe, Kyauktaw, Mrauk Oo, Kyaukpyu and Pauktaw townships.
Total population would be the sum of those excluded
number of Rohingyas from both north and south of Arakan and hidden number of
recent Bengali Rakhine migrants from Bangladesh and recent Burman settlements.
It is no doubt that they all will be made at least six million.
The authorities jointly with Rakhines people are
subsequently fingered Rohingya population in Northern Arakan State-NRS which
was also referred as Mayu Region consisting Maungdaw, Buthidaung and some part
of Rathedaung during 1959 to 1965.
As a fore-explanation, the fact of violations against
Arakanese Rohingyas during communal riots, political occasions and sectarian
attacks which were took place mostly in power transition periods, Rohingyans
had to unavoidably refuge at neighboring countries. Even on the time of their
repatriation, they were not resettle in the villages of where they were driven
out. And they were easily and forcefully relocated near by where majority
Rohingya lived.
In the amid of
humanitarian crises in June 2012, puppet PM Thein Sein came to urge UN and intl
communities to transfer all muslims of
Arakan state. However, such tune changed when Turkey came along with 50 million
aid of KSA. The government immigration officials conducted population check that 'most found non-foreigners in Arakan'. It is the government just finding
again alternative track of conducting family census check in order to expel them when
their evidences were burnt and they lands and registration have not been
performed for decades..
The land Arakan was earlier inhabitants of Indiana people and ruled by
Hindhu Dynasty up to 8th century AD. It is very clear that today culturally and
physically similar type of Indiana people are only Rohingya type of people.
Since Islam religion came to introduced in Arakan, Rohingyas are part of the
people who converted to Islam so they may be regarded as native convert rather
than decedent
of earlier Arab, Persian, Turkish, Bengali, and Pathan origin. Otherwise, yes, their
religion was descent from but not the people..
In regard to establish Rakhine
Independent state and Buddhism state in the other hand, Rakhine nationalists
and the country rules are just eagerly trying to expel entire muslims of Arakan
through progressively with various manners. Beside, Rakhine historians reused
the name Arakan in historic seminars despite they changed as Rakhine in 1974
which is the main key point of Rakhine people became the main people in the
1982 Citizenship Constitution that disregarded other inhabitants of Arakan
because the name Arakan represents all inhabitants residing within her.
Likewise, Rakhine historians also rewrote about the reason of it people’ appearance
like Mongo rather than Indian was such as for its people were believed to be
mixed in India before migration into Arakan. More by quoting the historical
statues that in deed were only belong to Hindhu type of religion but not ….
Majority of racist Rakhine people jointly
with nationalist politicians, bias academics, extremist Rakhines and radical
monks who have resentments towards Rohingya are openly saying that they never heard of Rohingya and misquoting as recent intruders and British era settlers. Despite there are ample of
evidences including those written in Burmese newspapers. The denial of Rohingya
is being their main objective rather than national unity for democracy and
national building.
Further in exile, Burmese nationalities
who seek refuge and championing in human rights, too are opposing the plight of
Rohingya and misinforming across the social networks and in various propaganda
meetings
The research of Marginalization of the rohingya in arakan state of western burma showed the report of Mr.
Paton as the British ruler of Arakan in 1825 stated that the total population of
Arakan was:- Maghs 60,000, Muslims 30,000 and Burman 10,000. Comparatively, the
report of British official, in 1825 the total population of Arakan was only one
lakh, of which 30 thousand i.e. 30% were Muslims. As per Census of 1831, the
total population of Arakan was 150,090 {district-wise population: Akyab
District ( 95,090 ), Thandwe District (20,000) and Kyaukpyu District ( 35,000)}.
Census records of British officials, in
Akyab District alone the Muslims (Mahamedan) population increased to 58,355 in
1872, 154,887 in 1901 and 178,647 in 1911 respectively. The 30 thousand Muslims
of Arakan of 1825 were the descendants of early settlers of Arabs, Persian,
Mughals, Bengalis and etc.
In calculation of the population growth of
both Rakhine and Rohingya, Rohingya is still behind than Rakhine? Because only
Rohingya or muslim were all the times driven out from homelands. Today Rohingya
population both inside and outside is just around 2.5% of the country's total population 65 millions. But the
government wrongfully view this few number as national threat.
(Photo:
Salem News)
But Rakhines people fancily describe Rohingyans as
recent migrants. Indeed, in the past five decades, there was no Rakhine
settlement found in the territory of Northern Rakhine State-NRS. Today Rakhines
those found in these regions were brought by government under the model village
settlement program from year 1991. Even in Sittwe during British Era, Muslim
population was quite bigger than Rakhine.
It's not untrue that there is no Bengali
population in Burma but Bengali population is not more than a few hundreds in
Arakan. However, it is also hard to determine whether their ancestral were
truly Bengali because for centuries the old Bengal(East Pakistan) and Arakan
were well enacted and ruled over each other and there were uncountable exoduses
in these two regions, particularly in power transition periods of 957, 1044,
1406, 1544, 1660, 1752, 1775, 1782, 1784, 1785, 1794, 1796, 1798, 1799, 1811,
1930, 1938, and 1942.
Among them, three major attacks recorded;
the first attack by king Anawrahta in 1044, the second invasion by king Min
Khaung Yaza’s in 1406 and the third major invasion was by Budapawa (King Bo Daw) in 1784.
(Rohingya IDs issued in 1978 written
Rohingya ethnicity)
As our conclusion, the world most
persecuted Rohingya issue remains unsettled. Whenever the Rohingya issues
recurred sporadically, it has been put to deal with human trafficking measure.
The neighboring countries do not find
further option accept from sending back into the danger of where they came
from. Thou, Bangladesh too has concerned for Rohingya matter keeping alive.
After the recent ASEAN summit in 2009,
when Datuk Sri Abdullah Ahmed Badawi, the prime minister of Malaysia was asked
to had comment on the Rohingya, he said we have some problems with the
Rohingya. When they come to us of course we know that they are from Myanmar,
but when we ask Myanmar, they ask: “are you sure they are our people? What evidence
have you got?
During the visit of UNHCR chief Mr.
Antonio Guterres to Arakan state of Burma, came to conclusion that UNHCR’s current
level of activities in northern Rakhing state where Rohingyas live does not
correspond to the actual needs and a decision was taken to upgrade the program
with immediate effect, a UN statement announced on 12th of March 2009.
It has been so long intl communities
approach the demon Burmese military junta through so call diplomatically. That
is why the demon government more and more dares to repeatedly commit
un-excusable crimes against minority communities .
Therefore, it is the time that the UN and
its super power countries are in position to interfere by deploying intl peace
keeping forces in order to ensure to guarantee the dignity and rights and the
continuous co-existences of Rohingya in Arakan State. And elimination of all
forms of abuses, discrimination and humiliation against Rohingya should be
materialized at the same time.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comment will be approved soon and your email will not be published.. thanks..